The project Duplex Z. Gulevic street, Vilnius II from the country Lithuania is raising investments in the amount of 100,000 euros for Real Estate development with an expected annual return of 9-11%. The loan term is 12 months, meaning the period for the borrower to repay the borrowed amount and interest on the loan. In this case, the borrower must repay the loan within 12 months after receiving the loan.
The project has a Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio of 45%, which is within the established maximum value of 45%. The Loan-to-Value ratio (the ratio of the loan amount to the market value of the collateral) is an important indicator in the financial sector, especially in collateralized lending. In this case, an LTV of 45% indicates that the loan amount is 45% of the current market value of the collateral (likely real estate or another asset). The maximum allowable LTV value for the project is 85%, which may be a restriction or standard requirement for this type of financing. Such LTV restrictions are set to reduce risks for the lender and ensure a more stable financial position for the project. For example, the lower the LTV, the lower the risk of default, as the borrower has more equity in the project.
The internal project number is P00001261-2 on the licensed crowdfunding platform Profitus from Lithuania. The platform states that they obtained a license in November 2023 from the European crowdfunding regulator ESMA. The ESMA license is quite complex, as out of over 1000 platforms in Europe in early 2024, only 150 managed to obtain this license.
Please note that the platform specifies that this information should not be construed as a recommendation, indication, or invitation to use a specific investment service and is not considered the basis or part of subsequent transactions. Investing always carries the risk of losing part or all of the investments. I agree with the Profitus platform and also recommend approaching investing responsibly by diversifying investments. In the European Union countries, crowdfunding is not prohibited by the Deposit Insurance and Investor Responsibility Law.
Replying to William
Replying to Nicholas